Latest Publications

J Robotic Surg. 2019.
A prospective analysis of robotic targeted MRI-US fusion prostate biopsy using the centroid targeting approach

Miah, S., Servian, P., Patel, A. et al.

World J Urol. 2018. 36(5):761-768.
Prostate cancer detection in patients with prior negative biopsy undergoing cognitive-, robotic- or in-bore MRI target biopsy

Kaufmann S, Russo GI, Bamberg F., Lowe L., Morgia G., Nikolaou K., Stenzl A., Kruck S. and Bedke J.

BJU Int. 2017
Targeted vs systematic robot‐assisted transperineal magnetic resonance imaging‐transrectal ultrasonography fusion prostate biopsy

Mischinger J, Kaufmann S, Russo GI, Harland N, Rausch S, Amend B, Scharpf M, Loewe L, Todenhoefer T, Notohamiprodjo M, Nikolaou K, Stenzl A, Bedke J, Kruck S

BJU Int. 2017 doi: 10.1111/bju.14089
Targeted versus systematic robot-assisted transperineal MRI-TRUS fusion prostate biopsy

Mischinger J., Kaufmann S., Russo Gl. et al.

Urol Clin North Am. 2017 44(4):525-534.
How to Biopsy: Transperineal verus transrectal, saturation versus targeted, what’s the evidence?

Grummet J.

Asian Journal of Urology. 2017
Outcomes of combination MRI-targeted and transperineal template biopsy in restaging low-risk prostate cancer for active surveillance

Chen K., Tay K.J., Law Y.M. et al.

Transl Androl Urol. 2017 6(3): 368–375.
Transperineal vs. transrectal biopsy in MRI targeting

Grummet J., Pepdjonovic L., Huang S., Anderson E. and Hadaschik B.

World J Urol. 2017 35(7):1023-1029
First report of robot-assisted transperineal fusion versus off-target biopsy in patients undergoing repeat prostate biopsy

Kaufmann S. Mischinger J., Amend B. et al.

Eur Urol Suppl 2017 16(3);e2092
Robotic MRI/US fusion transperineal biopsy using the iSR’obot Mona Lisa: Technique, safety and accuracy

Patel A., Servian P., Winkler M. et al.

BJU Int. 2016 117 (S3): 39-40
Robotic transperineal biopsy: an initial Australian experience of a novel device – the biobot Mona Lisa (TM)

Grummet J., Huang S., Mann S. Ryan A. and O’Sullivan R.

Customer Resources